
TECHNIQUE OF LAPAROSCOPIC GEOMETRICAL REPAIR OF VENTRAL HERNIA
Vishwanath Golash
Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia is based on the principle of fixing a large mesh tension free intraperitoneally. The mesh in laparoscopic repair is usually fixed with tackers or with both tackers and sutures, but some kind of suture fixation is mandatory. We describe here the technique of fixing the mesh with sutures only.
Methods
Over a period of 38 months we have repaired 112 ventral hernias. Using the same technique the mesh was fixed in the first 66 cases by sutures and tackers and in remaining 46 patients by sutures only. The 'sutures only' is our standard technique now. In our technique mesh is fixed by sutures in two circles. The sutures are placed at fixed intervals, in fixed numbers and in fixed positions as mapped out with the help of circular protractors, compass and ruler. The orientation and positioning of mesh is accurate even for a very large mesh.
Main findings
In this retrospective study there was no significant difference in terms of complications among those who had sutures and tacker versus sutures only. We had only one recurrence. There was no infection of the mesh, minimal wound pain and quicker recovery.
Conclusion
In this technique we have standardized the suture intervals, the number of sutures required, the position of sutures, and the length of sutures for fixing the mesh in laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia. This approach is suitable for all sizes of ventral hernia. It is a safe and cost effective technique.
Key words: laparoscopy, ventral hernia, suture fixation.
INTRODUCTION
There are several techniques of conventional open repair of ventral hernia described, with and without mesh, but repair without mesh has a higher recurrence of hernia (1-3). This incidence of recurrent hernia can be further reduced by using larger size mesh placed tension free, with minimal injury to the tissue by laparoscopic technique (4-7). The laparoscopic repair is applicable to all ventral hernias. We primarily repair all sizes of ventral hernia laparoscopically using suture fixation technique for the mesh. There are very few contraindications to this procedure depending on the experience of the surgeon and other associated medical conditions.
MATERIAL AND METHOD
From June 2000 to August 2003 we repaired 112 ventral and incisional hernias laparoscopically. There were 102 females and 10 male patients (9% male and 91% female) in age groups of 20 years to 79 years (mean age of 35 years). Here the incidence of ventral hernias is disproportionately higher in women probably due to multiple pregnancies and obesity. The female patients were younger than male patients. 69 patients had primary ventral hernia and the remainder were recurrent hernias (from 1- 6th recurrence) following previous hernia repair and laparotomies. The size of defect varied from 2 cms to 26 cms in diameter (with a mean of 4 cms). Those with recurrent hernias usually had multiple defects. 26 patients had other concomitant laparoscopic procedures performed at the same time including the repair of hiatus hernia in 4 patients, inguinal hernias repair in 4, cholecystectomy in 11, bilateral tubal ligation in 7 patients. The Polypropylene mesh was used in the first 64 ventral hernia repairs and Polytetrafluroethylene (PTFE) Gore-Tex Dual mesh plus Biomaterial in 48 cases.
We used the technique of fixing the mesh geometrically in two circles on the radial lines in all the 112 patients. In the first 66 cases alternating sutures and tackers were used in the outer circle on all the radial lines and tackers only on the inner circle at the alternate radial lines. In the rest of 46 patients using the same technique mesh was fixed by sutures only. The 'sutures only' is our present standard technique using Gore-Tex Dual mesh plus Biomaterial.
TECHNIQUE
|
|
Complete Video
|
Creation of Pneumoperitoneum:
All procedures were done under general anesthesia with right arm tucked by the side and patient lying supine. Pneumoperitoneum is created using veress needle or by open technique depending on the individual case well away from the scar and hernial defect (figure 1).
![]() |
|
Figure 1
|
Position and the number of the port:
The position and the number of ports are variable. In majority of cases we have managed with three ports. Two ports are inserted in right anterior axillary line: 10 mm port close to costal margin for 0 degree laparoscope and later on for the insertion of mesh and another 5 mm port close to anterior superior iliac spine. Depending on the site of hernia a third 5 mm port is inserted in the midline in epigastrium well above the umbilicus (figure 3). The surgeon and the assistant stands on the right side of the patient side by side.
![]() |
|
Figure 3
|
Reducing the Hernial contents:
Usually the contents (Figures 2, 4) are reduced by itself with the help of general anesthesia, and by pneumoperitoneum. The adhesions can be taken down with the help of scissors, ultracision hook, spatula or shears (Figure 4), external compression, and sometime by limited laparotomy. The hernial sac is not excised and hernial defect is not closed.
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Figure 2
|
Figure 4
|
|
|
Reduction and viability
|
|
|
Defect sizing
|
Measuring the hernial defect:
After reducing the contents, the hernial defect is measured by probing its margins at several places with a 22 gauge spinal needle (figure 5). Each pass is marked on the skin. These marks are joined together in a circle using the compass from the center point of the defect. This inner circle outlines the size of the defect.
![]() |
|
Figure 5
|
Further markings on the skin:
Holding a circular protractor with its centre point on the centre point of the defect, an outer circle is drawn 3-4 cm perimeter away from the inner circle which represents the size of mesh. The full circular protractors are our standard tool for this procedure and they are commercially available in different sizes of 10, 15, 18, and 20 cm etc. in diameter. A third circle is drawn from the centre point of the hernial defect with the help of the compass, 1 cm inside the outer circle. Outer sutures are tied on this third circle thus allowing a 1 cm free edge of the mesh circumferentially. Utilizing the radial markings on the circular protractors, the radial lines are drawn at equidistance from the outermost circle to the centre point of the defect resembling the spokes of a wheel (figure 6). These lines represent the suture intervals and the number of sutures required. The number of radial lines and hence the number of sutures vary according to the size of the mesh used, larger the mesh more the number of sutures.
![]() |
|
Figure 6
|
Markings on the mesh:
Similar 3 circles and the radial lines are drawn on the both sides (the white rough sticky side and brown smooth nonstick side) of the Gore-Tex Dual Mesh plus biomaterial corresponding precisely to the markings on the skin. The dual mesh is cut in a round patch along the outer circle. This patch when fixed is geometrically symmetrical around the hernial defect. Gore-Tex Dual Mesh plus biomaterial is ideal for the markings on both the sides of it as the markings are durable, do not rub off & spill even when the mesh is wet in the abdomen (Figures 7, 8).
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Figure 7
|
Figure 8
|
|
|
Mesh insertion
|
With the help of circular protractors we have standardized the placement intervals, positions and the number of sutures required for a particular size of mesh. For a 10x10 cm size circular patch of mesh we tie 16 sutures on the outer circle on all the radial lines and 8 sutures on the inner circle at the alternate radial lines. This number of sutures is doubled for 20x20 cm size mesh. Similarly for a 15x15 cm size mesh the number of sutures required is 24 on outer and 12 on inner circles and for a 18x18 cm size mesh 28 on outer and 14 on inner circle, and so on (figures 6, 7, 8).
Four quadrant prolene sutures and Inserting the mesh:
The next step is to tie four corner suture(6) of 'O' prolene at 0, 90, 180 & 3600 on the rough white side of the dual mesh 5 mm from the edge, leaving two free 18 cm long ends (figure 7). Holding on a grasper the mesh is inserted in a roll with the long ends of the sutures inside the roll (figure 9). Throughout the procedure the mesh does not come in contact with the patient's skin.
![]() |
|
Figure 9
|
|
|
Mesh fixation 1
|
|
|
Mesh fixation 2
|
Unfurling the mesh & retrieving the four corner sutures:
The mesh is unfurled intra-abdominally by the graspers, the white sticky side with four corner sutures facing up towards the anterior abdominal wall (figure 10). The long ends of the four corners suture are retrieved through the small stab wounds on the skin by the 'endoclose hook' (Tyco health care, USA) (figure 11). Abdomen is deflated and these sutures are tied subcutaneously (figure 12).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Figure 10
|
Figure 11
|
Figure 12
|
Fixation of mesh in two circles:
Multiple 1 mm stab wounds are made on the skin by size 11 surgical blades, on the radial lines on the outer circle to fix the mesh further by sutures circumferentially. Holding a free 36 cms long 'O' prolene suture on its hook with one end short and other end long, the endoclose hook is inserted through the stab wound and through the mesh. The long end of the suture is held on the artery clip outside while the short end is released from the endoclose hook and held on a grasper intraabdominal (figure 13).
![]() |
|
Figure 13
|
The endoclose hook is taken out and passed again through the same stab wound and through the mesh at a different angle making sure a bridge of mesh and tissue. This short end is re-fed on the hook and retrieved outside, thus making a horizontal mattress suture in place. The hook is passed on the either side of the radial line on the mesh to ensure a good bite of mesh in the suture. Both ends are held together on artery forceps. This is repeated through all the stab wounds. By feeding the suture on the endoclose hook before reinserting it and with right and left hand combination the operating time is reduced considerably. Geometrically the distance between the radial lines on the inner circle is reduced as compared to the outer circles. The sutures are inserted on the alternate radial lines on the skin on the inner circle, the hook is passed through one radial line on the mesh and coming out through the adjoining radial line on the mesh.
Positioning of the sutures is accurate as the radial lines on the skin falls on the radial lines drawn on the mesh like mirror image. The commonest sizes of mesh used in our patients were 10 and 15 cms in diameter. We leave minimum 3 cm overlap of mesh over the defect but mostly it is more as Dual mesh plus biomaterial is supplied in sizes of 10, 15, 18, 20 etc. in oval shapes but we cut a round patch leaving the transverse width intact. The Abdomen is deflated and all the sutures tied subcutaneously. This completes the suture fixation of the mesh (figures 14). The greater omentum is spread between the mesh and bowel as abdomen is deflated (figure 15).
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Figure 14
|
Figure 15
|
|
|
Mesh final view
|
|
|
Second look
|
RESULTS
In this retrospective study (7) there was no significant difference in terms of postoperative pain, recurrence, seroma formation, hospital stay, and recovery time among those who had sutures and tackers versus sutures only. Three patients had prolonged pain in the suture alone group and 2 in sutures with tacker group, varying from 3 weeks to 3 months, but all resolved conservatively. The majority of patients with prolene mesh complained of burning pain sensations over the area of patch from 3-8 days, the cause of which was probably reaction to mesh. Seroma formation of various sizes was quite common and was seen in 22 patients. We aspirated seroma in 5 patients after 1 months of surgery on the request of the patients without any further complications. There was no significant difference in the incidence of seroma formation between the types of mesh used. Larger the hernial sac more likely was the seroma formation. In one patient seroma recurred and was aspirated three times over a period of 4 months. No patient required blood transfusion. Two patients had re-laparoscopy, one had 48 hours after reducing the obstructed small gut for rechecking the viability and another had re-laparoscopy after 18 months for the repair of her hiatus hernia. In both these cases there were adhesions around the 1 cm free margin of the Dual mesh to the exposed sticky surface of the mesh but the smooth surface of the mesh was clear of any adhesions (figure 16).
![]() |
![]() |
|
Figure 16
|
Figure 17
|
Many patients with prolene mesh had nonspecific abdominal pain suggestive of adhesions (figure 17). No patient had prolonged ileus. I routinely give lactulose empirically from first day postoperatively to these patients. The 'sutures alone' took a little longer time but this is getting less with experience. We take on average one minute or less to secure one suture. There was no patient with prolonged stitch pain in 38 months of follow up. There was one recurrence after one year where entire previous incisional site was not covered by prolene mesh. In this patient mesh was fixed with sutures and tackers. There were two minor wound infections and no mesh infection in 112 patients. All hernias were repaired with a single sheet of mesh in a round patch. There were two small bowel injuries (4, 7) one managed laparoscopically and another by open, one case was converted to open because of colon injury. These bowel injuries occurred in patients with recurrent hernias secondary to previous prolene mesh repair. Again in two cases it was not possible to repair the hernia laparoscopically due to dense adhesions with previous prolene mesh. Time of operation varied from 80 minutes to 300 minutes with a mean of 120 minutes. Average hospital stay ranged from 2-9 days (mean 3 days).
DISCUSSION
Laparoscopic repair of ventral & incisional hernia requires the use of mesh based on the technique described by Stoppa but with the difference that hernia sac is not dissected & left behind (2, 8). It is entirely an intra-abdominal approach. Incidence of recurrence is low. The possible main causes of recurrences are the use of smaller mesh, fixing the mesh with tackers only and displacement of the mesh. As proven in several studies the suture fixation of the mesh is the integral part of the repair, we adopted the suture only method to make repair more secure and economical. In our technique the numbers, positions and the intervals of sutures is standardized. Majority of surgeons use both the tackers and the sutures for fixing the mesh and this technique is applicable to all. The operating time has increased marginally but the hospital stay has decreased. Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia has shown quicker recovery. It has considerably lowered the wound infection rate. It is as safe and effective as the traditional open repair. Patient satisfaction was high.
CONCLUSION
In this technique of suture fixation of the mesh we have standardized the suture intervals, position of the sutures, the number of sutures, and the length of the sutures. Intra-abdominal orientation is accurate. The fixation of mesh is precise and geometrically symmetrical. It is cost effective.
References
1. Roland W Luijendijk, Wim C J Hop, M Petrousjka van den Tol, Diederik C D Lange, Marijel M J Braaksma, Jan N M Ijzermans, Roel of U. Boelhouwer, Bas C. De Vries, Mark K.M. Salu, Jack C.J.Wereldsma, Cornelis M A, Bruijninckx, Johannes Jeekel, A comparison Of suture Repair with mesh repair for incisional Hernia; 'The New England journal Of medicine'; August 10, 2000- Vol.343, No.6
2 Stoppa RE; The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias; World journal of surgery; 1989; 13:545-54
3. J.Scott Roth, A.E.Park, D.Witzke, M.J.Mastrangelo, Laparoscopic incisional/ventral herniorrhaphy: a five years experience, Hernia, 1999, 4: 209-214
4. B Todd Heniford, MD, FACS, Adrian Park, MD, FACS, Bruce J Ramshaw, MD, FACS, Guy Voeller, MD, FACS, Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients, J Am Coll Surg 2000; 190(6):645-650
5.M.A.Carbajo, J.C.Martin del Olmo, J.I.Blanco, C.de la Cuesta, M. Toledano, F. Martin, C. Vaquero, L Inglada: Laparoscopic treatment vs. open surgery in the solution of major incisional and abdominal wall hernias with mesh; Surg Endosc. (1999): 13:250-252
6.David R. Reitter, J. Kevin Paulsen, James R. Debord, Norman C Estes; Five year Experience with the " Four before" Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: Department of Surgery, The University of Illinois, college of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, Illinois: The American Surgeon, May 2000,Volume 66, No.5, Pages 465-469
7. S. Bageacu, P.Blanc, C Breton, M Gonzales, J. Porcheron, M. Chabert, and J.G. Balique; Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia, a retrospective study of 159 patients; Department of General Surgery, Hospital Bellevue, C.H.U. de Saint-Etienne, 42055 Saint-Etienne Cedex 2, France; Surgical Endoscopy: February 2002; Volume 16, No 2, pages 345-348
8. Temudom T, Siadati M, Sarr MG, repair of complex giant or recurrent ventral hernias by using tension free intraperitoneal prosthetic mesh (Stoppa Technique): lesson learned from our initial experience (fifty patients) Surgery 1996; 120: 736-744